Friday, November 12, 2021

Paine "Part II Chapter 1" The injustice of God

 

To this point, I have been very critical concerning Mr. Paine's knowledge of the subject he is addressing. However, Part II takes on a completely different style as does his arguments. His previous attempt to critique the Christian religion by his own admittance was without even a Bible in hand and very limited resources. It appears it was a work he wanted to complete in his lifetime and felt the necessity for various reasons to attempt under not so best of circumstances. 

However, Part II at least appears to have much more substance and his efforts much more serious. The Chapters are only 2 with a conclusion and very lengthly. So we will not be able to address a chapter per post but will have to break it down into parts as we progress.

Mr. Paine's first observance in Chapter 1 is a very valid challenge to the Scriptures and deserves an honest Christian response. He does not mix or sweeten words but charges them as the Bible states them. He does not begin lightly but goes to task with the heavest of Theological questions. 

"There are matters in that book [the bible], said to be done by the express command of God, that are as shocking to humanity, and to every idea we have of moral justice, as any thing done by Robespierre, by Carrier, by Joseph le Bon, in France, by the English government in the East Indies, or by any other assassin in modern times. When we read in the books ascribed to Moses, Joshua, etc., that they (the Israelites) came by stealth upon whole nations of people, who, as the history itself shews, had given them no offence; that they put all those nations to the sword; that they spared neither age nor infancy; that they utterly destroyed men, women and children; that they left not a soul to breathe; expressions that are repeated over and over again in those books, and that too with exulting ferocity; are we sure these things are facts?" - Thomas Paine (The Age of Reason)

"To charge the commission of things upon the Almighty, which in their own nature, and by every rule of moral justice, are crimes, as all assassination is, and more especially the assassination of infants, is matter of serious concern. The Bible tells us, that those assassinations were done by the express command of God. To believe therefore the Bible to be true, we must unbelieve all our belief in the moral justice of God; for wherein could crying or smiling infants offend? And to read the Bible without horror, we must undo every thing that is tender, sympathising, and benevolent in the heart of man. Speaking for myself, if I had no other evidence that the Bible is fabulous, than the sacrifice I must make to believe it to be true, that alone would be sufficient to determine my choice." - Thomas Paine (The Age of Reason)

I am with Mr. Paine in feeling the human shock when reading this account of judgment upon other nations by the hand of Israel. It is a troubling passage for Christians to explain and most difficult to answer in a satisfactory manner. In whatever manner we attempt to answer this question it must not be out of our emotions, it must be from Scripture alone. Even Mr. Paine later in this discourse states he will seek no other sources other than the Bible to prove its fallacies. Shall we do any less in our defense?

Mr. Paine's first difficulty in understanding this passage is his view of man. He refers to the heart of man as tender, sympathizing, and benevolent while presenting these people upon whom Israel's army slaughtered as innocent individuals. {Jeremiah 17:9-10 ESV (9)  The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately sick; who can understand it? (10)  “I the LORD search the heart and test the mind, to give every man according to his ways, according to the fruit of his deeds.”} We first must understand these were pagan people steeped in their own religions and practicing all kinds of immoral rituals even sacrificing their own children burning them alive on the pagan altar. In the western world, especially to those living and sheltered in the United States, it is difficult for us to understand the cruelty of which men are capable. We have lived in a society mostly governed by Christian morality. Over the last few hundred years, it has given us a balance, a social understanding of acceptable behavior which most held to and attempted to live by. However, even under this influence man's depravity from time to time would upset that balance and shock us into a moment of reality. Sometimes we are able to camouflage our depravity in such a way we artificially maintain that balance. We do this by legalizing the killing of our children much like the pagan altar and calling it abortion.  

The Biblical answer to the passage above is not assassination as Mr. Paine views, but judgment upon a people for the fulness of their sins. It begins in {Genesis 15:13-16 ESV (13)  Then the LORD said to Abram, “Know for certain that your offspring will be sojourners in a land that is not theirs and will be servants there, and they will be afflicted for four hundred years. (14)  But I will bring judgment on the nation that they serve, and afterward they shall come out with great possessions. (15)  As for you, you shall go to your fathers in peace; you shall be buried in a good old age. (16)  And they shall come back here in the fourth generation, for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet complete.”} The context of the passage Mr. Paine is referencing is Isreal's return after those 400 years. The people they are sent to conquer and kill are the ones referenced in Genesis 15:16. After 400 years of national iniquity, God was bringing judgment and using Isreal to do it. Isreal itself would suffer such judgment for its own sin in the future. 

The god Mr. Paine envisions in his own mind is an unjust god. He sees him as kind and benevolent, forgiving our iniquities and giving us a wonderful life here and eternal bliss in the world to come. He believes his god is pleased in our good works and kind ways which earn us his favor. He would never respond to us as the God of the Bible does in the Scripture. But justice requires payment, if Mr. Paine's god forgives without payment, justice is not met and his god is unjust. This is not the God of the Bible, for though he is good, His perfect justice is not or cannot be set aside. His goodness is as just as His Justice is good. There is perfect harmony in all his attributes, therefore in His goodness His Justice is always met and satisfied.

{Proverbs 17:15 ESV (15)  He who justifies the wicked and he who condemns the righteous are both alike an abomination to the LORD.}

{Romans 3:21-26 ESV (21)  But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law, although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it (22)  the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe. For there is no distinction: (23)  for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, (24)  and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, (25)  whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God's righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins. (26)  It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.}

The passages above demonstrate how the God of the Bible passed over our sins and remained just in Himself. Through Christ justice was met, and the sinner was set free. It is called Grace, {Ephesians 2:4-9 ESV (4)  But God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved us, (5) even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ by grace you have been saved (6)  and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, (7)  so that in the coming ages he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. (8)  For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, (9)  not a result of works, so that no one may boast.}

Mr. Paine's concept of God is much too small and his view of man much to good. The God of the Bible is an infinite being in every aspect of who he is. Man is a finite creature full of sin and every day even in his most pious acts offends and sins against this God. We cannot comprehend infinite perfection, we are flawed in our being to such an extent we cannot cease from sin. Without a mediator, we are condemned from our very conception. As a child, we are innocent only in the aspect we have not yet comprehended our sin, it is our nature, it is who we are. God chose to judge those people in the passages Mr. Paine presented, even worse than the slaughter, hell awaited and they are still there. If God chose today to close the door of his Mercy and judge the world in horrified judgment and cast it into hell, He would be justified in doing so. The fact Mr. Paine does not see or understand will not change it. 

Thursday, November 11, 2021

Paine "Chapters 14, 15, 16, 17"

 

Let me begin by apologizing for the lack of substance in the following post. Mr. Paine's logic and reasoning were so absurd it should not be necessary to critique them. However, the following chapters were in his work, so as useless at the time was, it was necessary to work through them.  

In chapter 14 Mr. Paine gives a primitive description of the Universe with the knowledge that would have been available to him in his time and commits on the benefits of this world to man and attributes it all the God's creation.

"Having thus endeavored to convey, in a familiar and easy manner, some idea of the structure of the universe, I return to explain what I before alluded to, namely, the great benefits arising to man in consequence of the Creator having made a plurality of worlds, such as our system is, consisting of a central Sun and six worlds, besides satellites, in preference to that of creating one world only of a vast extent." - Thomas Paine (The Age of Reason)

In chapter 15 he continues to commit upon the plurality of worlds in the creation and the wonder and awe it should give us of the creator. It appears Mr. Paine is content to believe in a god and speak of his glories as long as it is one of his own understanding and not the Christian God.

"As therefore the Creator made nothing in vain, so also must it be believed that he organized the structure of the universe in the most advantageous manner for the benefit of man; and as we see, and from experience feel, the benefits we derive from the structure of the universe, formed as it is, which benefits we should not have had the opportunity of enjoying if the structure, so far as relates to our system, had been a solitary globe, we can discover at least one reason why a plurality of worlds has been made, and that reason calls forth the devotional gratitude of man, as well as his admiration." - Thomas Paine (The Age of Reason)

He then makes reference to inhabitants of other worlds gaining and benefiting from the same creation. It appears he believed there was life on the other planets observing our world as we observed theirs. It is unclear where he got this idea from, I did a quick search and could not find anywhere where this was a popular view. 

"Neither does the knowledge stop here. The system of worlds next to us exhibits, in its revolutions, the same principles and school of science, to the inhabitants of their system, as our system does to us, and in like manner throughout the immensity of space." - Thomas Paine (The Age of Reason)

In chapter 16 Mr. Paine levels the accusation that this knowledge of the universe renders the Christian faith irrelevant. However, he offers no explanation or reason for this. A vague allusion to the Christian system holding to only one world without any explanation of what he means by that statement.

"But such is the strange construction of the Christian system of faith, that every evidence the heavens affords to man, either directly contradicts it or renders it absurd." - Thomas Paine (The Age of Reason)  

In chapter 17, he suggests there are three means by which people are deceived into believing a religion.

"Those three means are Mystery, Miracle, and Prophecy." - Thomas Paine (The Age of Reason)

Beginning with Mystery, Mr. Paine launches into an illogical form of reasoning attempting to separate truth from mystery. Saying truth can never be shrouded in mystery, of which at this point we are assuming he is still speaking of the Christian system. He then attempts to suggest there is no mystery in God as he understands him. Is it not a strange form of reason that accounts all of Creation to a god and yet finds no mystery in that? All of his reasoning at this point is truly the mystery, for no reasonable or logical understanding can be arrived from them. Every truth is a mystery to us until it is discovered. 

"The God in whom we believe is a God of moral truth, and not a God of mystery or obscurity. Mystery is the antagonist of truth. It is a fog of human invention that obscures truth, and represents it in distortion. Truth never envelops itself in mystery; and the mystery in which it is at any time enveloped, is the work of its antagonist, and never of itself. Religion, therefore, being the belief of a God, and the practice of moral truth, cannot have connection with mystery. The belief of a God, so far from having anything of mystery in it, is of all beliefs the most easy, because it arises to us, as is before observed, out of necessity." - Thomas Paine (The Age of Reason)

Moving next to Miracles, he again launches in absurd reasonings about everything being a miracle, making comparisons with elephants and mites suggesting one is as big a miracle as the other. His complete discourse on miracles appears nothing but foolish musing of a mind that has no reference upon which to begin. I digress to comment further and just leave you to read it yourself if you are doubtful.

"The story of the whale swallowing Jonah, though a whale is large enough to do it, borders greatly on the marvellous; but it would have approached nearer to the idea of a miracle, if Jonah had swallowed the whale. In this, which may serve for all cases of miracles, the matter would decide itself as before stated, namely, Is it more probable that a man should have swallowed a whale, or told a lie? But suppose that Jonah had really swallowed the whale, and gone with it in his belly to Nineveh, and to convince the people that it was true have cast it up in their sight, of the full length and size of a whale, would they not have believed him to have been the devil instead of a prophet? or if the whale had carried Jonah to Nineveh, and cast him up in the same public manner, would they not have believed the whale to have been the devil, and Jonah one of his imps?" - Thomas Paine (The Age of Reason)

When he then moves on to Prophecy he reverts back to his previous arguments that the meaning of the word prophecy had been deceptively changed to mislead us. He then continues on with illogical reasons that leave you with nothing of substance. 

"Everything unintelligible was prophetical, and everything insignificant was typical. A blunder would have served for a prophecy; and a dish-clout for a type." - Thomas Paine (The Age of Reason)



Blog Archive